NTF Worksheet: ccwatch37.doc. 8-08.
NEBRASKA TAXPAYERS FOR FREEDOM
WORKSHEET:
ANALYSIS OF THE CITY OF OMAHA
BUDGET: FY 2008-2009.
BACKGROUND. This budget promises no property tax increase for the next fiscal year,
but valuations in Douglas County have risen about 5%, notwithstanding the
estimated real estate 2.7% increase shown in the budget, so home owners and commercial/industrial
property owners who received valuation hikes will pay more in property taxes
than shown on the pie chart. The city
tax rate has remained static since 2002, but valuations on Omaha homes have
risen about 44% since that time. Property
taxes would provide 22.4% of projected General Fund revenues FY 2009, a 2.5%
hike in revenue. Omaha realtors tell us
that property values have dropped 5-15% because of the real estate crisis, so
we urge the council to cut the property tax rate to factor in this
devaluation. Because of increased
mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures, the property tax collection rate
probably will fall. The budget boasts
that the tax rate is 18.5% lower than 1999 and 33.3% lower than in 1994. This statement ignores the skyrocketing
valuation hikes on property. The budget
estimates a 3.5% hike in sales tax revenue to supply about 46% of revenue for
the General Fund, though a recession looms with attendant lessening of consumer
spending. The city made a similar error
in 2001 as a recession loomed. Retail
gross sales tax receipts this year are the lowest % hike since 2001. Sales tax revenue will rise from annexations, however, expenditures will rise also to service
the new residents. The 2008 and 2009
hikes in projected sales tax gross receipts mainly accrue from annexations, yet
Omaha cannot continue to annex neighborhoods to accelerate sales tax
revenues. The Qwest Center continues to
place a heavy yoke on our property tax load to repay bonded indebtedness and
drains our debt service fund, a crucial reason to increase budget cuts. Revenues to repay this debt are much lower
than anticipated in the original financing proposal. A property tax hike in 2012 would eliminate
negative balances projected for the debt service fund, another incentive to cut
spending. Appropriations for the Human Resources Dept.
would rise 6.23%, though no new employees hired. General Fund revenues are not keeping pace
with inflation. The Commission of
Industrial Relations has not ruled on police and fire union cases; the outcome
may adversely affect expenditures. Pare
the budget.
BUDGET CUT & EFFICIENCY SUGGESTIONS:
·
To
recoup $500,000 expended for demolition of substandard structures, implement an
urban homestead program for vacant lots (see NTF issue paper).
·
Instead
of spending $125,000 on a new police auditor, restore the civilian review
board, which seemed to work well with unpaid appointees.
·
Payments
to the county jail would rise by almost 9%, so accelerate the merger of city
and county jails to save dollars.
·
Total employee
wages would rise by over 24%, far above the current inflation rate. The administration should harden its
collective bargaining stance to lessen this increase.
· Retired police and firefighters pay none of their health insurance premiums until age 65, when they become eligible for Medicare. Reconfigure the retiree supplemental pension benefits system, which we believe much too generous. Calculate pension payments on base salaries. Prevent police and fire division employees from loading up on overtime, working extra shifts, or cashing in comp time shortly before retirement in order to boost their pension benefits, spiking. Match comp time to that given police officers and firefighters in similar cities. Reform the unfunded pension liability problem by reconfiguring how pensions base on salaries. The pension system is imbalanced. This gaping hole may not affect the operating budget currently, but financial problems will arise for the next 27 years. We incur added pension imbalances each year, because benefits approved by contract do not become paid for on a current basis, causing about an 11% deficit annually. 6% of this deficit can disappear by removing spiking. Pension payments base on the highest 12 months of pay during the last 5 yrs. of service. Spiking constitutes $33.3 million, 75% of the expanded gap between assets and amount needed to pay future benefits. Police and firefighter spiking rose 18% in 2006. It will raise pre-retirement pay 10% above regular salaries. Police and firefighters are earning higher salaries than actuaries anticipated. More police and firefighters are retiring early to take advantage of spiking largesse. Those who retire with at least 25 yrs. of service can collect 75% of yearly pay, up by 2-3%. In one egregious case, an Omaha policeman who earned a base salary of $54,136 retired in 2006 with a $124,906 inflated pay by spiking, earning him a $90,000 annual pension. More police officers and firefighters are retiring after 25 yrs. of service, because they have no incentive to remain. Under the 2004 contract, those who retire after 7-1-2007 get 75% of their regular pay. Contracts also allow our police to retire at 45, firefighters at 50, with 25 yrs. of service, younger than in most other depts. Either rein in benefits or make employees pay larger contributions themselves. Requiring retirees to pay a part of their health insurance costs would eliminate another 1-2%. Stop the yearly losses and stabilize the pension funds. New accounting standards required of cities will force Omaha to carry long-term unfunded pension liabilities on the balance sheet. Then the pension problem could impact our city AAA bond rating. The worst part of this problem is that our city loses many of its knowledgeable and veteran police officers and firefighters earlier in their careers, before future contracts lessen their pensions. From 2001 to 2007, budget hikes for the fire dept. have risen by 33%, 32% for the police division, while only 3% budget growth accrued to other depts. Future taxpayers must fuel these pension funds without action now.
·
Health
insurance hikes of $6.4 million (17%) over the last budget should give the city
incentive to force employees to pay at least 30% of health care premiums, as do
many other government employees.
·
Make
police and firefighters pay an increasing percentage of their health care
premiums, like other city employees.
·
Retiree
health insurance costs would rise by 13.7%, so rework retirement benefits to
lower taxpayer funding. The unfunded actuarial liability is about $300 million
now. The largesse bestowed on early
retirees persuaded many more than usual to take early retirement, so the city
is paying premiums on more retirees plus their replacements. Remove the incentive for early retirement.
·
Pension
systems for union employees seriously are underfunded, so employees should pay
more into this fund.
·
All
retiree employee benefits would increase by almost 11%, so rework these
benefits to lower taxpayer funding.
·
Parks
and Recreation dept. expenses would rise by almost 10%, Public Works dept.
expenses by almost 18%, an incentive to begin privatizing these depts.
·
The
Sundawgs program plays a vital role in our community, under a category of
parks/recreation services historically provided by urban government. However, we oppose increasing its funding by
$24,000 or placing its services under control of OTOC, which we believe would
use this program to propagandize its leftist viewpoints to children. Much of Sundawgs funding comes from the
private sector already, and additional funding could come from same.
·
Urge the
Convention and Visitors Bureau to solicit funding from the private sector,
particularly from businesses benefiting from bureau publicity and
advertising.
·
Delete
funding for Women Against Violence, saving $50,000.
·
Delete
funding for county violence coordinating commission, saving $25,000.
·
Delete
funding for Downtown Celebration Lights, saving $10,000.
·
Delete
funding for the Latino museum, saving $2,500.
·
Delete
funding for Omaha by Design, saving $50,000.
·
Incoming
revenues from the Riverfront Plaza and parking garages have fallen drastically,
so privatize these services with private lease arrangements guaranteeing
revenues.
·
Restrain
spending on projects funded by Community Development Block Grants, because
federal funding is decreasing, and local property taxpayers should not face
picking up the funding slack. In the
Planning Dept., CDBG grant funding has decreased by $300,000 already.
·
Lock in
lower costs over a longer time in fuel contracts.
·
As the
city soon will abandon Rosenblatt Stadium, delete the $50,000 for minor
ballpark renovations there.
·
Delete
funding for homeless day services, saving $100,000.
·
Spend
the $$ that the Mayor earmarked for homeless assistance on expanding city
library hours, as citizens want to use these facilities more hours and
additional days. Libraries historically
are a necessary function of city government.
Private entities already fund homeless shelters, e.g., Alegent
contributed $1 million to programs that aid the homeless (Omaha World-Herald
7-23-07).
· Lobby state and federal governments to fund or end unfunded mandates on local governments.
·
Increase EMS fees to reflect the current
Medicare allowable rates for this region, adding $182,950 in revenue, and
implement an electronic patient care reporting system to save $49,000-$64,000
annually (Matrix Study p. B-8).
NTF Issue Paper: Ccwatchl8. 3-07.
NEBRASKA TAXPAYERS FOR FREEDOM
ISSUE PAPER:
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
SUBDIVISION AND QUASI-GOVERNMENTAL PAID LOBBYISTS.
CITY OF OMAHA. The city has one staff lobbyist and contracts out for 2 others. Omaha paid its lobbyist $88,081 in 2007 in salary and fringe benefits. He represents the city in establishing and maintaining contacts in municipal, county, and state governments and in public and private organizations like the chambers of commerce. He represents the city at the state legislature, to secure legislation favorable to the city, performing research, compiling statistics and reports, and providing the city council and mayor with budget information to help them make policy decisions. In January, 2007, the City of Omaha staff lobbyist lobbied the legislature to allow local municipalities to continue their ban on concealed handguns, though the Unicameral the previous year had passed a law permitting concealed carry statewide. Moreover, the city council voted to end the ban on concealed firearms within the city limits. This lobbyist also pressed legislation to permit creation of entertainment and tourism districts for economic development, another taxpayer burden. The 2 contract lobbyists received $19,400 and $18,000 respectively. One lobbies the federal government; the other lobbies the legislature. The City Council voted to pay $51,497 dues to the League of Nebraska Municipalities in 11-06.
These suggested cuts would help decrease the proposed $9.6 million hike in General Fund spending.
Research and analysis for this worksheet done by Nebraska Taxpayers for Freedom, with express prior permission granted for its use by Citizens for Local Control, Cherry County Taxpayers, Dawes County Taxpayers, and other groups in the Tax Freedom Network. 8-08. C